Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
HC granted a 90-day extension to the Company for listing shares on the nationwide stock exchange, overriding SEBI's earlier orders. The ruling emphasized courts should adopt a liberal approach in time extension matters rather than a pedantic stance. The decision considered that no shareholders had raised grievances, and the Company provided reasonable explanations for previous delays, which SEBI and NSE had accepted until 30.09.2023. The extension was granted under Article 226, with the condition that failure to comply within the stipulated timeframe would result in reinstatement of SEBI's original orders. The judgment prioritized shareholder protection while balancing regulatory compliance requirements.
HC granted a 90-day extension to the Company for listing shares on the nationwide stock exchange, overriding SEBI's earlier orders. The ruling emphasized courts should adopt a liberal approach in time extension matters rather than a pedantic stance. The decision considered that no shareholders had raised grievances, and the Company provided reasonable explanations for previous delays, which SEBI and NSE had accepted until 30.09.2023. The extension was granted under Article 226, with the condition that failure to comply within the stipulated timeframe would result in reinstatement of SEBI's original orders. The judgment prioritized shareholder protection while balancing regulatory compliance requirements.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.