Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
NCLAT upheld the admission of Pre-Packaged Insolvency Resolution Process (PPIRP) for the Corporate Debtor (CD), a registered MSME. While acknowledging that the Section 54C application was filed beyond the 14-day statutory period after the Section 7 application, the Tribunal determined it would not serve stakeholder interests to invalidate the completed resolution. The CD's resolution involved three consortium bank members, with SBI (47.21%), IDBI (26.70%), and Bank of Baroda (26.09%) vote shares. The Tribunal directed the Successful Resolution Applicant to pay any differential amount due to the dissenting financial creditor within 30 days, in accordance with Section 30(2)(b) of IBC. The resolution plan's implementation was maintained, prioritizing the special protection afforded to MSMEs under Chapter III-A of the IBC.
NCLAT upheld the admission of Pre-Packaged Insolvency Resolution Process (PPIRP) for the Corporate Debtor (CD), a registered MSME. While acknowledging that the Section 54C application was filed beyond the 14-day statutory period after the Section 7 application, the Tribunal determined it would not serve stakeholder interests to invalidate the completed resolution. The CD's resolution involved three consortium bank members, with SBI (47.21%), IDBI (26.70%), and Bank of Baroda (26.09%) vote shares. The Tribunal directed the Successful Resolution Applicant to pay any differential amount due to the dissenting financial creditor within 30 days, in accordance with Section 30(2)(b) of IBC. The resolution plan's implementation was maintained, prioritizing the special protection afforded to MSMEs under Chapter III-A of the IBC.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
