Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
HC ruled in favor of the petitioner regarding input tax credit (ITC) dispute under GST law. The court established that electronic credit ledger functions as a pool of funds with separate compartments for IGST, CGST, and SGST. Although petitioner utilized CGST and SGST credits instead of IGST, this did not constitute wrongful availment under Section 16(2)(c) of GST Act. Court set aside proceedings initiated under Section 73 of CGST Act, directing reconsideration of original orders. The ruling affirms that mere utilization of different tax head credits does not amount to improper ITC claim when overall credit pool is legitimate. Matter remanded for fresh consideration by tax authorities.
HC ruled in favor of the petitioner regarding input tax credit (ITC) dispute under GST law. The court established that electronic credit ledger functions as a pool of funds with separate compartments for IGST, CGST, and SGST. Although petitioner utilized CGST and SGST credits instead of IGST, this did not constitute wrongful availment under Section 16(2)(c) of GST Act. Court set aside proceedings initiated under Section 73 of CGST Act, directing reconsideration of original orders. The ruling affirms that mere utilization of different tax head credits does not amount to improper ITC claim when overall credit pool is legitimate. Matter remanded for fresh consideration by tax authorities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.