Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT upheld taxpayer's claim for exemption under section 54B regarding capital gains from sale of agricultural land. Evidence showed consistent agricultural income in previous years, including Rs. 14,000 for AY 2011-12. Independent verification by halka Patwari confirmed cultivation of Gwar crop on the disputed land. While Revenue contested full exemption claim since only part of land was used for agriculture, ITAT found the entire parcel constituted an integrated agricultural asset. Taxpayer complied with reinvestment requirements by purchasing new agricultural land and temporarily depositing Rs. 60 lacs in Capital Gains Scheme, which was later properly declared for taxation. The tribunal ruled the section 54B exemption was validly claimed based on documented agricultural use and compliant reinvestment.
ITAT upheld taxpayer's claim for exemption under section 54B regarding capital gains from sale of agricultural land. Evidence showed consistent agricultural income in previous years, including Rs. 14,000 for AY 2011-12. Independent verification by halka Patwari confirmed cultivation of Gwar crop on the disputed land. While Revenue contested full exemption claim since only part of land was used for agriculture, ITAT found the entire parcel constituted an integrated agricultural asset. Taxpayer complied with reinvestment requirements by purchasing new agricultural land and temporarily depositing Rs. 60 lacs in Capital Gains Scheme, which was later properly declared for taxation. The tribunal ruled the section 54B exemption was validly claimed based on documented agricultural use and compliant reinvestment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.