Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT upheld taxpayer's claim for exemption under section 54B regarding capital gains from sale of agricultural land. Evidence showed consistent agricultural income in previous years, including Rs. 14,000 for AY 2011-12. Independent verification by halka Patwari confirmed cultivation of Gwar crop on the disputed land. While Revenue contested full exemption claim since only part of land was used for agriculture, ITAT found the entire parcel constituted an integrated agricultural asset. Taxpayer complied with reinvestment requirements by purchasing new agricultural land and temporarily depositing Rs. 60 lacs in Capital Gains Scheme, which was later properly declared for taxation. The tribunal ruled the section 54B exemption was validly claimed based on documented agricultural use and compliant reinvestment.
ITAT upheld taxpayer's claim for exemption under section 54B regarding capital gains from sale of agricultural land. Evidence showed consistent agricultural income in previous years, including Rs. 14,000 for AY 2011-12. Independent verification by halka Patwari confirmed cultivation of Gwar crop on the disputed land. While Revenue contested full exemption claim since only part of land was used for agriculture, ITAT found the entire parcel constituted an integrated agricultural asset. Taxpayer complied with reinvestment requirements by purchasing new agricultural land and temporarily depositing Rs. 60 lacs in Capital Gains Scheme, which was later properly declared for taxation. The tribunal ruled the section 54B exemption was validly claimed based on documented agricultural use and compliant reinvestment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
