Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
SC determined service tax cannot be levied on lottery ticket sales between state governments and distributors. The relationship between Government of Sikkim and distributors was established as principal-to-principal, not principal-agent. The Court held that conducting lotteries falls within "betting and gambling" under Entry 62-List II of Seventh Schedule, placing it under state jurisdiction. Parliamentary amendments to Finance Act, 1994 attempting to impose service tax on lottery distributors were deemed ineffective since no service was rendered in an agency capacity. The Court emphasized that while lottery tickets constitute actionable claims, conducting lotteries is fundamentally a betting and gambling activity regulated under state authority. Appeals by Union of India were dismissed, affirming states' exclusive right to tax such transactions.
SC determined service tax cannot be levied on lottery ticket sales between state governments and distributors. The relationship between Government of Sikkim and distributors was established as principal-to-principal, not principal-agent. The Court held that conducting lotteries falls within "betting and gambling" under Entry 62-List II of Seventh Schedule, placing it under state jurisdiction. Parliamentary amendments to Finance Act, 1994 attempting to impose service tax on lottery distributors were deemed ineffective since no service was rendered in an agency capacity. The Court emphasized that while lottery tickets constitute actionable claims, conducting lotteries is fundamentally a betting and gambling activity regulated under state authority. Appeals by Union of India were dismissed, affirming states' exclusive right to tax such transactions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
