Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT addressed valuation dispute regarding imported electronic calculators where declared values were rejected and redetermined without sharing market enquiry report with the appellant. The Tribunal found violation of natural justice principles as appellant was denied opportunity to examine and respond to market survey data used for value redetermination. Following precedent from CST v. R.P. Dixit Saghidar, CESTAT remanded matter to Original Authority with directions to provide appellant copy of market inquiry report and worksheet, allow reasonable opportunity for response, and conduct fresh adjudication. The ruling emphasized proper implementation of Customs Valuation Rules 2007 and importance of transparency in value rejection proceedings.
CESTAT addressed valuation dispute regarding imported electronic calculators where declared values were rejected and redetermined without sharing market enquiry report with the appellant. The Tribunal found violation of natural justice principles as appellant was denied opportunity to examine and respond to market survey data used for value redetermination. Following precedent from CST v. R.P. Dixit Saghidar, CESTAT remanded matter to Original Authority with directions to provide appellant copy of market inquiry report and worksheet, allow reasonable opportunity for response, and conduct fresh adjudication. The ruling emphasized proper implementation of Customs Valuation Rules 2007 and importance of transparency in value rejection proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
