Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT affirmed NCLT's jurisdiction to address pre-CIRP dues refund applications under Section 60(5)(c). The tribunal held that all pre-CIRP claims were extinguished upon resolution plan approval, where appellant's claim of 2,32,13,387 was settled for 4,64,003. The respondent's request for refund of pre-CIRP payments was granted, as these payments were made under duress to maintain electricity supply. The tribunal emphasized that post-resolution plan approval, no additional pre-CIRP claims could be entertained, following precedents from SC judgments in Paschimanchal Vidyut and Ghanshyam Mishra cases. The appellant was barred from recovering any pre-CIRP dues beyond the approved resolution plan amount.
NCLAT affirmed NCLT's jurisdiction to address pre-CIRP dues refund applications under Section 60(5)(c). The tribunal held that all pre-CIRP claims were extinguished upon resolution plan approval, where appellant's claim of 2,32,13,387 was settled for 4,64,003. The respondent's request for refund of pre-CIRP payments was granted, as these payments were made under duress to maintain electricity supply. The tribunal emphasized that post-resolution plan approval, no additional pre-CIRP claims could be entertained, following precedents from SC judgments in Paschimanchal Vidyut and Ghanshyam Mishra cases. The appellant was barred from recovering any pre-CIRP dues beyond the approved resolution plan amount.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
