Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
ITAT overturned addition of unaccounted money allegedly received by assessee representing 20% of total consideration. Addition was based on extrapolation from loose papers discovered during search operations. Tribunal held that extrapolation for on-money receipts from shop sales cannot be sustained where no specific evidence was found during search, no proper investigation was conducted, and key witness was not questioned about incriminating documents. Additionally, many flats were sold to parties different from those listed in loose sheets, and buyers were unrelated parties. Given CIT(A) had already deleted similar additions for another partner in joint venture project Ganga Acropolis, ITAT deleted the disputed addition for AY 2017-18, ruling in assessee's favor.
ITAT overturned addition of unaccounted money allegedly received by assessee representing 20% of total consideration. Addition was based on extrapolation from loose papers discovered during search operations. Tribunal held that extrapolation for on-money receipts from shop sales cannot be sustained where no specific evidence was found during search, no proper investigation was conducted, and key witness was not questioned about incriminating documents. Additionally, many flats were sold to parties different from those listed in loose sheets, and buyers were unrelated parties. Given CIT(A) had already deleted similar additions for another partner in joint venture project Ganga Acropolis, ITAT deleted the disputed addition for AY 2017-18, ruling in assessee's favor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
