Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT ruled against PCIT's revision order under s.263 regarding unaccounted cash purchases of Rs.5,83,99,000/-. The Tribunal held that where AO had already estimated profits on unaccounted cash purchases, additional disallowance under s.40A(3) was not warranted. Following established HC precedents, ITAT found AO's approach of applying gross profit estimation was a plausible view, precluding PCIT's revisionary powers. The assessment considering seized materials and ledger accounts demonstrated these were trading receipts during business operations. Since profits were already estimated and taxed on cash transactions, further disallowance under s.40A(3) was legally untenable. Assessee's appeals allowed, setting aside revision proceedings.
ITAT ruled against PCIT's revision order under s.263 regarding unaccounted cash purchases of Rs.5,83,99,000/-. The Tribunal held that where AO had already estimated profits on unaccounted cash purchases, additional disallowance under s.40A(3) was not warranted. Following established HC precedents, ITAT found AO's approach of applying gross profit estimation was a plausible view, precluding PCIT's revisionary powers. The assessment considering seized materials and ledger accounts demonstrated these were trading receipts during business operations. Since profits were already estimated and taxed on cash transactions, further disallowance under s.40A(3) was legally untenable. Assessee's appeals allowed, setting aside revision proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
