Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal against CIT(A)'s order deleting additions under s.68 for alleged bogus share capital and unsecured loans. The assessee successfully demonstrated identity, creditworthiness, and transaction genuineness by providing shareholder confirmations, bank statements, and ITRs. AO's additions were rejected as based merely on doubt without contradictory evidence. CIT(A)'s partial allowance of s.14A disallowance was upheld, limiting it to investments yielding exempt income. ITAT affirmed CIT(A)'s authority to admit additional evidence without mandatory AO remand under s.250(4) and Rule 46A(4). The related interest expenses on unsecured loans were consequently allowed, and corresponding adjustments to WIP were permitted.
ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal against CIT(A)'s order deleting additions under s.68 for alleged bogus share capital and unsecured loans. The assessee successfully demonstrated identity, creditworthiness, and transaction genuineness by providing shareholder confirmations, bank statements, and ITRs. AO's additions were rejected as based merely on doubt without contradictory evidence. CIT(A)'s partial allowance of s.14A disallowance was upheld, limiting it to investments yielding exempt income. ITAT affirmed CIT(A)'s authority to admit additional evidence without mandatory AO remand under s.250(4) and Rule 46A(4). The related interest expenses on unsecured loans were consequently allowed, and corresponding adjustments to WIP were permitted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
