Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
NCLAT determined that invocation of corporate guarantee after CIRP commencement is impermissible under Section 14 IBC moratorium provisions. The corporate guarantee was invoked on 18.09.2020, subsequent to CIRP initiation date of 27.01.2020. Following precedents from SC in Ghanshyam Mishra and NCLAT in Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction, the tribunal held that claims based on guarantees invoked post-CIRP cannot be admitted as they had not matured when CIRP commenced. The guarantee should have been invoked prior to CIRP initiation for any valid claim. The appeal was allowed, invalidating the respondent's claim filed based on post-CIRP guarantee invocation, as it violated moratorium restrictions under IBC.
NCLAT determined that invocation of corporate guarantee after CIRP commencement is impermissible under Section 14 IBC moratorium provisions. The corporate guarantee was invoked on 18.09.2020, subsequent to CIRP initiation date of 27.01.2020. Following precedents from SC in Ghanshyam Mishra and NCLAT in Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction, the tribunal held that claims based on guarantees invoked post-CIRP cannot be admitted as they had not matured when CIRP commenced. The guarantee should have been invoked prior to CIRP initiation for any valid claim. The appeal was allowed, invalidating the respondent's claim filed based on post-CIRP guarantee invocation, as it violated moratorium restrictions under IBC.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
