Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging GST return rectification and liability waiver, citing availability of statutory remedy under Section 107 CGST Act. The court noted petitioner failed to respond to show cause notice dated 27-12-2023, DRC-01A, and jurisdictional Range officer's communications. Following SC precedent in Assistant Commissioner of State Tax case, HC held that where statutory appeal mechanism exists, writ jurisdiction cannot be invoked unless fundamental rights violation or natural justice breach is established. As petitioner neither demonstrated such exceptions nor exhausted available remedies, the petition was disposed of directing petitioner to pursue statutory appeals under CGST Act.
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging GST return rectification and liability waiver, citing availability of statutory remedy under Section 107 CGST Act. The court noted petitioner failed to respond to show cause notice dated 27-12-2023, DRC-01A, and jurisdictional Range officer's communications. Following SC precedent in Assistant Commissioner of State Tax case, HC held that where statutory appeal mechanism exists, writ jurisdiction cannot be invoked unless fundamental rights violation or natural justice breach is established. As petitioner neither demonstrated such exceptions nor exhausted available remedies, the petition was disposed of directing petitioner to pursue statutory appeals under CGST Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.