Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
481 to 500 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
SC allowed appeal against rejection of compounding application for offense under s.276CC for delayed tax return filing. Court held offense under s.276CC is committed day after due date under s.139(1), not on actual filing date. For AY 2013-14, offense occurred on 01.11.2013, before show cause notice dated 27.10.2014 for AY 2011-12 offense. This qualified as "first offense" under 2014 Compounding Guidelines. Court noted evolution toward more flexible compounding regime, with s.276CC now Category A offense allowing up to three compounding occasions. Orders of HC and CCIT rejected, appellant directed to file fresh compounding application within two weeks.
SC allowed appeal against rejection of compounding application for offense under s.276CC for delayed tax return filing. Court held offense under s.276CC is committed day after due date under s.139(1), not on actual filing date. For AY 2013-14, offense occurred on 01.11.2013, before show cause notice dated 27.10.2014 for AY 2011-12 offense. This qualified as "first offense" under 2014 Compounding Guidelines. Court noted evolution toward more flexible compounding regime, with s.276CC now Category A offense allowing up to three compounding occasions. Orders of HC and CCIT rejected, appellant directed to file fresh compounding application within two weeks.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.