Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
121 to 140 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT ruled that N/N. 36/2021-Customs dated 19.07.2021, which amended N/N. 45/2017-Customs, cannot have retrospective effect from 30.06.2017. Per Section 25(4) of Customs Act, notifications under subsection (1) take effect from publication date unless specifically provided otherwise. The Amendment Notification neither explicitly stated retrospective application nor indicated Explanation (d) was retrospective. The tribunal rejected Commissioner (Appeals)' interpretation based on CBIC circular citing GST Council meeting minutes. Following precedent set in InterGlobe Aviation Limited case, CESTAT held the amendment applies prospectively from 19.07.2021. Appeal allowed and impugned order set aside.
CESTAT ruled that N/N. 36/2021-Customs dated 19.07.2021, which amended N/N. 45/2017-Customs, cannot have retrospective effect from 30.06.2017. Per Section 25(4) of Customs Act, notifications under subsection (1) take effect from publication date unless specifically provided otherwise. The Amendment Notification neither explicitly stated retrospective application nor indicated Explanation (d) was retrospective. The tribunal rejected Commissioner (Appeals)' interpretation based on CBIC circular citing GST Council meeting minutes. Following precedent set in InterGlobe Aviation Limited case, CESTAT held the amendment applies prospectively from 19.07.2021. Appeal allowed and impugned order set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.