Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT ruled that N/N. 36/2021-Customs dated 19.07.2021, which amended N/N. 45/2017-Customs, cannot have retrospective effect from 30.06.2017. Per Section 25(4) of Customs Act, notifications under subsection (1) take effect from publication date unless specifically provided otherwise. The Amendment Notification neither explicitly stated retrospective application nor indicated Explanation (d) was retrospective. The tribunal rejected Commissioner (Appeals)' interpretation based on CBIC circular citing GST Council meeting minutes. Following precedent set in InterGlobe Aviation Limited case, CESTAT held the amendment applies prospectively from 19.07.2021. Appeal allowed and impugned order set aside.
CESTAT ruled that N/N. 36/2021-Customs dated 19.07.2021, which amended N/N. 45/2017-Customs, cannot have retrospective effect from 30.06.2017. Per Section 25(4) of Customs Act, notifications under subsection (1) take effect from publication date unless specifically provided otherwise. The Amendment Notification neither explicitly stated retrospective application nor indicated Explanation (d) was retrospective. The tribunal rejected Commissioner (Appeals)' interpretation based on CBIC circular citing GST Council meeting minutes. Following precedent set in InterGlobe Aviation Limited case, CESTAT held the amendment applies prospectively from 19.07.2021. Appeal allowed and impugned order set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.