Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
HC remanded proceedings back to ITAT for de novo hearing due to violation of natural justice principles. The original assessment order by NFAC was passed ex-parte without granting the petitioner an opportunity to be heard. ITAT failed to address this procedural defect and proceeded to evaluate the case on merits, disregarding written submissions presented by the petitioner. The court found the violation of natural justice principles to be real and palpable, as the petitioner was deprived of presenting their case both before the assessing officer and ITAT. The matter requires fresh consideration with proper hearing opportunities in accordance with principles of fairness and natural justice.
HC remanded proceedings back to ITAT for de novo hearing due to violation of natural justice principles. The original assessment order by NFAC was passed ex-parte without granting the petitioner an opportunity to be heard. ITAT failed to address this procedural defect and proceeded to evaluate the case on merits, disregarding written submissions presented by the petitioner. The court found the violation of natural justice principles to be real and palpable, as the petitioner was deprived of presenting their case both before the assessing officer and ITAT. The matter requires fresh consideration with proper hearing opportunities in accordance with principles of fairness and natural justice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
