Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT partially allowed the appeal concerning disputed agricultural income and cash deposits during demonetization. The addition of differential agricultural income was deleted as the original return was processed under s.143(1) and not scrutinized. Regarding unexplained cash credits under s.68, ITAT upheld the addition based on lack of evidence for agricultural activity but acknowledged legitimate business transactions from retail trading. The Tribunal rejected retrospective application of enhanced tax rates under s.115BBE, directing taxation at normal rates with applicable surcharges. The assessee's retail business "Shreeji Paints & Ply" provided partial justification for cash deposits, resulting in partial relief against the additions made by the AO.
ITAT partially allowed the appeal concerning disputed agricultural income and cash deposits during demonetization. The addition of differential agricultural income was deleted as the original return was processed under s.143(1) and not scrutinized. Regarding unexplained cash credits under s.68, ITAT upheld the addition based on lack of evidence for agricultural activity but acknowledged legitimate business transactions from retail trading. The Tribunal rejected retrospective application of enhanced tax rates under s.115BBE, directing taxation at normal rates with applicable surcharges. The assessee's retail business "Shreeji Paints & Ply" provided partial justification for cash deposits, resulting in partial relief against the additions made by the AO.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.