Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT determined two distinct service classifications under separate agreements with CONCOR. Under the first agreement for terminal handling, the service was classified as "supply of tangible goods" based on hiring of reach stackers at fixed rates, not cargo handling. For the second agreement involving cargo operations, the tribunal remanded the matter regarding service tax liability on export cargo for fresh adjudication. The adjudicating authority must reconsider the case after allowing appellant to submit additional evidence within 6 weeks to substantiate claims about export cargo handling and challenge the extended limitation period. The appeal was partially allowed through remand, with clear distinction maintained between supply of equipment and actual cargo handling services.
CESTAT determined two distinct service classifications under separate agreements with CONCOR. Under the first agreement for terminal handling, the service was classified as "supply of tangible goods" based on hiring of reach stackers at fixed rates, not cargo handling. For the second agreement involving cargo operations, the tribunal remanded the matter regarding service tax liability on export cargo for fresh adjudication. The adjudicating authority must reconsider the case after allowing appellant to submit additional evidence within 6 weeks to substantiate claims about export cargo handling and challenge the extended limitation period. The appeal was partially allowed through remand, with clear distinction maintained between supply of equipment and actual cargo handling services.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.