Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
SC held that successive petitions under Section 482 Cr.PC are maintainable when there is a change in circumstances, particularly changes in law. The Court overturned HC's dismissal of a subsequent petition related to cheque dishonor, finding it unjustified to reject solely because the earlier petition was withdrawn without leave to file afresh. The Court clarified that Section 148 of N.I. Act preserves appellate courts' discretion regarding deposit conditions, emphasizing that 'may' and 'shall' in the statute must be interpreted literally. The matter was remanded to Sessions Court for re-examination of the deposit issue, with both the HC and Sessions Court's previous orders being set aside.
SC held that successive petitions under Section 482 Cr.PC are maintainable when there is a change in circumstances, particularly changes in law. The Court overturned HC's dismissal of a subsequent petition related to cheque dishonor, finding it unjustified to reject solely because the earlier petition was withdrawn without leave to file afresh. The Court clarified that Section 148 of N.I. Act preserves appellate courts' discretion regarding deposit conditions, emphasizing that 'may' and 'shall' in the statute must be interpreted literally. The matter was remanded to Sessions Court for re-examination of the deposit issue, with both the HC and Sessions Court's previous orders being set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.