Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC quashed reassessment notices and order finding them invalid under Section 147 of Income Tax Act. Notices issued after four years were without fresh material indicating escaped income. Complete disclosure was made in original return and assessment under Section 143(3). AO's attempt to revisit Section 14A disallowance constituted mere change of opinion, not valid grounds for reopening. Court emphasized that determining Section 14A disallowance was AO's responsibility during original assessment, where assessee had provided all relevant documents. Reopening failed first proviso requirements of Section 147, particularly beyond four-year limitation period. Jurisdiction could not be assumed without failure by assessee to disclose material facts.
HC quashed reassessment notices and order finding them invalid under Section 147 of Income Tax Act. Notices issued after four years were without fresh material indicating escaped income. Complete disclosure was made in original return and assessment under Section 143(3). AO's attempt to revisit Section 14A disallowance constituted mere change of opinion, not valid grounds for reopening. Court emphasized that determining Section 14A disallowance was AO's responsibility during original assessment, where assessee had provided all relevant documents. Reopening failed first proviso requirements of Section 147, particularly beyond four-year limitation period. Jurisdiction could not be assumed without failure by assessee to disclose material facts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.