Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC quashed reassessment notices and order finding them invalid under Section 147 of Income Tax Act. Notices issued after four years were without fresh material indicating escaped income. Complete disclosure was made in original return and assessment under Section 143(3). AO's attempt to revisit Section 14A disallowance constituted mere change of opinion, not valid grounds for reopening. Court emphasized that determining Section 14A disallowance was AO's responsibility during original assessment, where assessee had provided all relevant documents. Reopening failed first proviso requirements of Section 147, particularly beyond four-year limitation period. Jurisdiction could not be assumed without failure by assessee to disclose material facts.
HC quashed reassessment notices and order finding them invalid under Section 147 of Income Tax Act. Notices issued after four years were without fresh material indicating escaped income. Complete disclosure was made in original return and assessment under Section 143(3). AO's attempt to revisit Section 14A disallowance constituted mere change of opinion, not valid grounds for reopening. Court emphasized that determining Section 14A disallowance was AO's responsibility during original assessment, where assessee had provided all relevant documents. Reopening failed first proviso requirements of Section 147, particularly beyond four-year limitation period. Jurisdiction could not be assumed without failure by assessee to disclose material facts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
