Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT ruled against establishing a dependent agent Permanent Establishment (PE) of foreign entity (Japan) through its Indian subsidiary under India-Japan DTAA Article 5. Indian subsidiary functioned solely as a communication channel between Japanese parent and Indian customers, without authority to conclude contracts or maintain inventory. AO's application of Rule 10 with Section 44BB to estimate 10% deemed profits was rejected. ITAT found tax authorities' conclusions were based on assumptions without examining agency agreement or conducting independent inquiry. Despite trading business continuity, mere existence of business flow insufficient to establish principal-agent relationship. Clear factual evidence demonstrated absence of PE, negating need for further verification of contractual relationship between entities as directed in previous years.
ITAT ruled against establishing a dependent agent Permanent Establishment (PE) of foreign entity (Japan) through its Indian subsidiary under India-Japan DTAA Article 5. Indian subsidiary functioned solely as a communication channel between Japanese parent and Indian customers, without authority to conclude contracts or maintain inventory. AO's application of Rule 10 with Section 44BB to estimate 10% deemed profits was rejected. ITAT found tax authorities' conclusions were based on assumptions without examining agency agreement or conducting independent inquiry. Despite trading business continuity, mere existence of business flow insufficient to establish principal-agent relationship. Clear factual evidence demonstrated absence of PE, negating need for further verification of contractual relationship between entities as directed in previous years.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
