Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC permitted compounding of offense under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act post-conviction based on parties' subsequent compromise. While acknowledging that inherent powers must be exercised sparingly, HC held that Section 147 of NI Act, containing non-obstante clause, allows compromise settlements despite contrary provisions in CrPC. Given the amicable settlement between parties, HC annulled the conviction and sentence, directing acquittal of accused. Court ordered refund of Rs.35,000/- deposited by Revision Petitioner with accrued interest within four weeks. The ruling emphasizes that special law (NI Act) prevails over general law (CrPC) regarding compromise settlements, even at post-conviction stage.
HC permitted compounding of offense under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act post-conviction based on parties' subsequent compromise. While acknowledging that inherent powers must be exercised sparingly, HC held that Section 147 of NI Act, containing non-obstante clause, allows compromise settlements despite contrary provisions in CrPC. Given the amicable settlement between parties, HC annulled the conviction and sentence, directing acquittal of accused. Court ordered refund of Rs.35,000/- deposited by Revision Petitioner with accrued interest within four weeks. The ruling emphasizes that special law (NI Act) prevails over general law (CrPC) regarding compromise settlements, even at post-conviction stage.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
