Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
ITAT ruled against additions made under section 69 for alleged cash loans and notional interest. The additions were based solely on documents seized during third-party premises search and statements under section 132(4), which were later retracted claiming duress. Despite concurrent searches at appellant's premises, no incriminating evidence was found to support alleged cash transactions. The absence of promissory notes or other documentation for substantial loan amounts was deemed improbable. ITAT held that Assessing Officer failed to gather corroborative evidence beyond seized materials and third-party statements. The tribunal concluded additions for unexplained investments and notional interest were unsustainable without cogent evidence, ruling in appellant's favor.
ITAT ruled against additions made under section 69 for alleged cash loans and notional interest. The additions were based solely on documents seized during third-party premises search and statements under section 132(4), which were later retracted claiming duress. Despite concurrent searches at appellant's premises, no incriminating evidence was found to support alleged cash transactions. The absence of promissory notes or other documentation for substantial loan amounts was deemed improbable. ITAT held that Assessing Officer failed to gather corroborative evidence beyond seized materials and third-party statements. The tribunal concluded additions for unexplained investments and notional interest were unsustainable without cogent evidence, ruling in appellant's favor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
