Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
AT ruled against double seizure of bank lockers and gold in a money laundering case. The lockers (no. 86 and 96) were already under CBI custody, making subsequent seizure under PMLA Section 17(1) unjustified as there was no risk of concealment. Regarding 3.2kg gold, seizure was invalidated based on CBDT guidelines allowing women to possess specified quantities (500g for married, 250g for unmarried). AT held that properties under one authority's seizure cannot be re-seized by another unless released by the initial authority. The respondent retains right to fresh seizure upon CBI's release. The impugned order was partially modified, and appeal disposed of accordingly.
AT ruled against double seizure of bank lockers and gold in a money laundering case. The lockers (no. 86 and 96) were already under CBI custody, making subsequent seizure under PMLA Section 17(1) unjustified as there was no risk of concealment. Regarding 3.2kg gold, seizure was invalidated based on CBDT guidelines allowing women to possess specified quantities (500g for married, 250g for unmarried). AT held that properties under one authority's seizure cannot be re-seized by another unless released by the initial authority. The respondent retains right to fresh seizure upon CBI's release. The impugned order was partially modified, and appeal disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.