Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
HC ruled in favor of the appellant regarding customs duty refund claims from 2014-2015. While initial refunds were granted, subsequent litigation reached SC, which established in ITC Limited case that refunds require modified assessment orders under Section 128 of Customs Act. HC determined appeals were timely filed within 90 days of ITC judgment. The court rejected the limitation argument, considering Section 14 applicable since ITC fundamentally changed refund basis. Delay was deemed condonable given the legal evolution of refund requirements through judicial precedents. The court emphasized that previous adjudication had not raised timing issues between bills of entry and refund applications, making that period irrelevant for current appeal timing calculations.
HC ruled in favor of the appellant regarding customs duty refund claims from 2014-2015. While initial refunds were granted, subsequent litigation reached SC, which established in ITC Limited case that refunds require modified assessment orders under Section 128 of Customs Act. HC determined appeals were timely filed within 90 days of ITC judgment. The court rejected the limitation argument, considering Section 14 applicable since ITC fundamentally changed refund basis. Delay was deemed condonable given the legal evolution of refund requirements through judicial precedents. The court emphasized that previous adjudication had not raised timing issues between bills of entry and refund applications, making that period irrelevant for current appeal timing calculations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
