Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
CESTAT ruled on classification disputes for various mobile phone components. The Tribunal held that Receivers should be classified under CTH 85177090 as phone parts, not standalone audio equipment under CTH 8518. Microphones were denied exemption under N/N. 57/2017-Cus. Connectors qualified for exemption benefits and were classified under CTH 85369090. Various covers and assemblies (Rear Cover, Front Housing, Camera Lens etc.) were deemed eligible for exemption under N/N. 50/2017 and classified under CTH 85177090 as cellular phone parts. The Tribunal emphasized that parts integral to phone functionality should be classified as phone components rather than standalone devices. Extended period limitations were rejected where genuine interpretative issues existed, restricting demands to normal period with applicable interest.
CESTAT ruled on classification disputes for various mobile phone components. The Tribunal held that Receivers should be classified under CTH 85177090 as phone parts, not standalone audio equipment under CTH 8518. Microphones were denied exemption under N/N. 57/2017-Cus. Connectors qualified for exemption benefits and were classified under CTH 85369090. Various covers and assemblies (Rear Cover, Front Housing, Camera Lens etc.) were deemed eligible for exemption under N/N. 50/2017 and classified under CTH 85177090 as cellular phone parts. The Tribunal emphasized that parts integral to phone functionality should be classified as phone components rather than standalone devices. Extended period limitations were rejected where genuine interpretative issues existed, restricting demands to normal period with applicable interest.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
