Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
HC dismissed petition challenging penalty under GST Act Section 129(3) regarding detained Pokland Machine. Court found petitioner's claim of transferring goods to Varanasi parking yard required investigation. Petitioner's failure to claim ownership within 15-day period and casual handling of matter undermined credibility of assertions. Court directed petitioner to pursue statutory appeal remedy, permitting application of Limitation Act Section 14. Petition dismissed without prejudice to alternative remedies available under law.
HC dismissed petition challenging penalty under GST Act Section 129(3) regarding detained Pokland Machine. Court found petitioner's claim of transferring goods to Varanasi parking yard required investigation. Petitioner's failure to claim ownership within 15-day period and casual handling of matter undermined credibility of assertions. Court directed petitioner to pursue statutory appeal remedy, permitting application of Limitation Act Section 14. Petition dismissed without prejudice to alternative remedies available under law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
