Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT ruled against reopening of assessment concerning alleged unaccounted cash loans of Rs.11.05 crore. AO's action based solely on Investigation Wing's information about cash loans through a broker was deemed insufficient for establishing income escapement. The mere receipt of loans cannot constitute income without substantiating evidence of sham transactions. AO failed to discharge the burden of proof after assessee's denial, presenting no corroborating evidence of actual lenders or cash possession. No valuable assets or undisclosed income were discovered with the assessee. The tribunal invalidated the assessment reopening due to lack of tangible material demonstrating income concealment beyond mere information about loan transactions.
ITAT ruled against reopening of assessment concerning alleged unaccounted cash loans of Rs.11.05 crore. AO's action based solely on Investigation Wing's information about cash loans through a broker was deemed insufficient for establishing income escapement. The mere receipt of loans cannot constitute income without substantiating evidence of sham transactions. AO failed to discharge the burden of proof after assessee's denial, presenting no corroborating evidence of actual lenders or cash possession. No valuable assets or undisclosed income were discovered with the assessee. The tribunal invalidated the assessment reopening due to lack of tangible material demonstrating income concealment beyond mere information about loan transactions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
