Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT examined unexplained cash credits under s.69A r/w 115BBE. Tribunal validated partnership withdrawals based on capital account records of Sai Samarth Plaza. Regarding cash advances, assessee provided affidavits from 17 persons confirming pre-demonetization payments with identity proof. Revenue's failure to verify claims through s.131 statements worked in assessee's favor despite sub-20,000 daily transactions raising suspicion. However, claim of Rs. 3,14,500 as receivables recovery was rejected due to absence of bifurcation in IT return for AY 2016-17 and lack of concrete evidence proving genuineness of sundry debtors, despite assessee falling under Presumptive Taxation Scheme. Addition partially sustained.
ITAT examined unexplained cash credits under s.69A r/w 115BBE. Tribunal validated partnership withdrawals based on capital account records of Sai Samarth Plaza. Regarding cash advances, assessee provided affidavits from 17 persons confirming pre-demonetization payments with identity proof. Revenue's failure to verify claims through s.131 statements worked in assessee's favor despite sub-20,000 daily transactions raising suspicion. However, claim of Rs. 3,14,500 as receivables recovery was rejected due to absence of bifurcation in IT return for AY 2016-17 and lack of concrete evidence proving genuineness of sundry debtors, despite assessee falling under Presumptive Taxation Scheme. Addition partially sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
