Incomplete BIS testing cannot justify reclassification or confiscatory action; declared customs classification restored and enhanced redemption fine s...
Page of 4824
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96463 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC set aside tax liability determination under section 73 of CGST Act, 2017 and remanded for fresh consideration. The case involved ITC claims related to construction of shopping malls. Following Safari Retreats precedent, court held that 'plant or machinery' interpretation under section 17(5)(d) requires factual determination based on business context. Original order failed to consider Safari Retreats principles regarding classification of malls as plant. Issues regarding 8 invoices and ITC reporting discrepancies between GSTR-3B and GSTR-9 forms remain open for fresh examination. Matter remanded for de novo consideration incorporating Supreme Court's interpretative guidance.
HC set aside tax liability determination under section 73 of CGST Act, 2017 and remanded for fresh consideration. The case involved ITC claims related to construction of shopping malls. Following Safari Retreats precedent, court held that 'plant or machinery' interpretation under section 17(5)(d) requires factual determination based on business context. Original order failed to consider Safari Retreats principles regarding classification of malls as plant. Issues regarding 8 invoices and ITC reporting discrepancies between GSTR-3B and GSTR-9 forms remain open for fresh examination. Matter remanded for de novo consideration incorporating Supreme Court's interpretative guidance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
