Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The AAR ruled on GST implications in an EPC contract between the applicant and IOCL. The contract was determined to be a single, composite works contract rather than a divisible one, despite comprising two work orders. The high seas sale (HSS) transaction was deemed neither a supply of goods nor services under Schedule III of CGST Act. However, the value of imported goods sold on HSS basis must be included in the transaction value for GST computation on works contract services, as per Section 15 of CGST Act. The ruling established that subsequent incorporation of HSS goods into works contract constitutes a composite supply treated as service under Schedule II. The contract's taxation involves both customs duty at importation and GST on the composite works contract service.
The AAR ruled on GST implications in an EPC contract between the applicant and IOCL. The contract was determined to be a single, composite works contract rather than a divisible one, despite comprising two work orders. The high seas sale (HSS) transaction was deemed neither a supply of goods nor services under Schedule III of CGST Act. However, the value of imported goods sold on HSS basis must be included in the transaction value for GST computation on works contract services, as per Section 15 of CGST Act. The ruling established that subsequent incorporation of HSS goods into works contract constitutes a composite supply treated as service under Schedule II. The contract's taxation involves both customs duty at importation and GST on the composite works contract service.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
