Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC quashed reassessment proceedings initiated under s.147 regarding alleged undervaluation of shares of TREPL. AO's attempt to reopen assessment was based on the value of immovable property (Friends Colony) held by TREPL, an issue previously examined in earlier reassessment proceedings. Petitioner had already demonstrated through audited financial statements that TREPL owned only two floors of the property, which AO had accepted. The court found that reopening the same issue violated procedural requirements under s.148A(d), as AO failed to consider petitioner's response to s.148A(b) notice and the existing record. Since the information was previously scrutinized and no credible contradictory evidence existed, reassessment was held invalid.
HC quashed reassessment proceedings initiated under s.147 regarding alleged undervaluation of shares of TREPL. AO's attempt to reopen assessment was based on the value of immovable property (Friends Colony) held by TREPL, an issue previously examined in earlier reassessment proceedings. Petitioner had already demonstrated through audited financial statements that TREPL owned only two floors of the property, which AO had accepted. The court found that reopening the same issue violated procedural requirements under s.148A(d), as AO failed to consider petitioner's response to s.148A(b) notice and the existing record. Since the information was previously scrutinized and no credible contradictory evidence existed, reassessment was held invalid.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
