Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
HC quashed reassessment proceedings initiated under s.147 regarding alleged undervaluation of shares of TREPL. AO's attempt to reopen assessment was based on the value of immovable property (Friends Colony) held by TREPL, an issue previously examined in earlier reassessment proceedings. Petitioner had already demonstrated through audited financial statements that TREPL owned only two floors of the property, which AO had accepted. The court found that reopening the same issue violated procedural requirements under s.148A(d), as AO failed to consider petitioner's response to s.148A(b) notice and the existing record. Since the information was previously scrutinized and no credible contradictory evidence existed, reassessment was held invalid.
HC quashed reassessment proceedings initiated under s.147 regarding alleged undervaluation of shares of TREPL. AO's attempt to reopen assessment was based on the value of immovable property (Friends Colony) held by TREPL, an issue previously examined in earlier reassessment proceedings. Petitioner had already demonstrated through audited financial statements that TREPL owned only two floors of the property, which AO had accepted. The court found that reopening the same issue violated procedural requirements under s.148A(d), as AO failed to consider petitioner's response to s.148A(b) notice and the existing record. Since the information was previously scrutinized and no credible contradictory evidence existed, reassessment was held invalid.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
