Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC determined the reassessment notice issued on 30.07.2022 was time-barred under Section 149(1). While TOLA provided AO twenty-nine days limitation period from 01.06.2021, and considering the two-week response time given to assessee under Section 148A(b), the limitation period expired on 12.07.2022. The court found the notice issued on 30.07.2022 was beyond prescribed limitation. The fourth proviso to Section 149 was inapplicable as AO had sufficient time to pass order under Section 148A(d). The HC quashed both the order under Section 148A(d) and notice under Section 148, ruling in assessee's favor due to the procedural time-bar.
HC determined the reassessment notice issued on 30.07.2022 was time-barred under Section 149(1). While TOLA provided AO twenty-nine days limitation period from 01.06.2021, and considering the two-week response time given to assessee under Section 148A(b), the limitation period expired on 12.07.2022. The court found the notice issued on 30.07.2022 was beyond prescribed limitation. The fourth proviso to Section 149 was inapplicable as AO had sufficient time to pass order under Section 148A(d). The HC quashed both the order under Section 148A(d) and notice under Section 148, ruling in assessee's favor due to the procedural time-bar.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
