Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC ruled that Black Money Act proceedings cannot continue where income was declared and settled under Chapter XIX-A of Income Tax Act prior to Black Money Act implementation. The assessee filed returns on 21.05.2015, before the Black Money Act came into effect on 01.07.2015. The settlement under Chapter XIX-A was deemed valid and binding, making subsequent notices under Section 10(1) of Black Money Act untenable. HC emphasized that the Black Money Act's implementation does not invalidate prior settlements under Income Tax Act, supported by CBDT Circular No.12/2015. The settlement commission's order dated 26.08.2022 was upheld as final, effectively barring parallel proceedings under Black Money Act.
HC ruled that Black Money Act proceedings cannot continue where income was declared and settled under Chapter XIX-A of Income Tax Act prior to Black Money Act implementation. The assessee filed returns on 21.05.2015, before the Black Money Act came into effect on 01.07.2015. The settlement under Chapter XIX-A was deemed valid and binding, making subsequent notices under Section 10(1) of Black Money Act untenable. HC emphasized that the Black Money Act's implementation does not invalidate prior settlements under Income Tax Act, supported by CBDT Circular No.12/2015. The settlement commission's order dated 26.08.2022 was upheld as final, effectively barring parallel proceedings under Black Money Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
