Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT upheld Commissioner (Appeals)'s decision to remand case back to Adjudicating Authority for fresh adjudication. The original order was challenged for violating natural justice principles, particularly regarding interpretation of Standing Order 6/2022 concerning Bills of Entry exclusions under Customs Act Sections 149 and 154. The Tribunal found Commissioner (Appeals) acted within statutory powers under Section 128A(3) of Customs Act, 1962, as original adjudication failed to observe natural justice principles. The remand order was deemed proper and legally sound, despite appellant's contention about arbitrary application of standing order. Appeal dismissed, confirming Commissioner (Appeals)'s remand order for fresh adjudication.
CESTAT upheld Commissioner (Appeals)'s decision to remand case back to Adjudicating Authority for fresh adjudication. The original order was challenged for violating natural justice principles, particularly regarding interpretation of Standing Order 6/2022 concerning Bills of Entry exclusions under Customs Act Sections 149 and 154. The Tribunal found Commissioner (Appeals) acted within statutory powers under Section 128A(3) of Customs Act, 1962, as original adjudication failed to observe natural justice principles. The remand order was deemed proper and legally sound, despite appellant's contention about arbitrary application of standing order. Appeal dismissed, confirming Commissioner (Appeals)'s remand order for fresh adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
