Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The SC delivered a split verdict regarding the interpretation of Section 31(4) proviso of IBC concerning CCI approval timing for resolution plans. The majority opinion (Roy and Dhulia, JJ.) held that obtaining CCI approval prior to Committee of Creditors' approval is mandatory, based on literal interpretation of the statute. They found the resolution plan unsustainable without prior CCI clearance and directed reconsideration of plans with existing CCI approvals. The dissenting opinion (Bhatti, J.) interpreted the provision as directory rather than mandatory, emphasizing CoC's commercial wisdom and arguing that CCI approval could be obtained before NCLT's final approval. The majority also identified procedural lapses in CCI's approval process, including failure to issue notice to the target company and discrepancies in operational data disclosures. The matter requires further jurisprudential development due to conflicting interpretations.
The SC delivered a split verdict regarding the interpretation of Section 31(4) proviso of IBC concerning CCI approval timing for resolution plans. The majority opinion (Roy and Dhulia, JJ.) held that obtaining CCI approval prior to Committee of Creditors' approval is mandatory, based on literal interpretation of the statute. They found the resolution plan unsustainable without prior CCI clearance and directed reconsideration of plans with existing CCI approvals. The dissenting opinion (Bhatti, J.) interpreted the provision as directory rather than mandatory, emphasizing CoC's commercial wisdom and arguing that CCI approval could be obtained before NCLT's final approval. The majority also identified procedural lapses in CCI's approval process, including failure to issue notice to the target company and discrepancies in operational data disclosures. The matter requires further jurisprudential development due to conflicting interpretations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
