Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC denied bail in money laundering case involving spurious anti-cancer medicine manufacturing scheme. Despite applicant's claim for exemption under Rs. 1 crore threshold per Section 45 PMLA proviso, court found scheme's total value exceeded this limit. Court applied twin conditions under Section 45 PMLA and statutory presumption under Section 24. Evidentiary materials including Section 50 PMLA statements, financial records, and WhatsApp communications demonstrated applicant's involvement in proceeds of crime. Applicant failed to rebut presumption of guilt or satisfy bail conditions. Court emphasized admissibility of Section 50 statements as judicial proceedings, rejecting constitutional challenge. Given ongoing investigation and supplementary prosecution complaint, bail application dismissed.
HC denied bail in money laundering case involving spurious anti-cancer medicine manufacturing scheme. Despite applicant's claim for exemption under Rs. 1 crore threshold per Section 45 PMLA proviso, court found scheme's total value exceeded this limit. Court applied twin conditions under Section 45 PMLA and statutory presumption under Section 24. Evidentiary materials including Section 50 PMLA statements, financial records, and WhatsApp communications demonstrated applicant's involvement in proceeds of crime. Applicant failed to rebut presumption of guilt or satisfy bail conditions. Court emphasized admissibility of Section 50 statements as judicial proceedings, rejecting constitutional challenge. Given ongoing investigation and supplementary prosecution complaint, bail application dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.