Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT rejected appellant's challenge against service tax classification of after-sales and promotional services provided to foreign company's Indian customers during July 2012-September 2014. Court held these constituted intermediary services under Place of Provision Rules 2012, not export of services, as appellant facilitated services between foreign company and Indian buyers. The 2014 amendment merely expanded scope to include goods-related intermediary services. Services were taxable even before amendment as they involved arranging/facilitating services in India. Extended limitation period upheld due to appellant's non-disclosure of relevant information. Appeal dismissed, confirming service tax liability and extended recovery period.
CESTAT rejected appellant's challenge against service tax classification of after-sales and promotional services provided to foreign company's Indian customers during July 2012-September 2014. Court held these constituted intermediary services under Place of Provision Rules 2012, not export of services, as appellant facilitated services between foreign company and Indian buyers. The 2014 amendment merely expanded scope to include goods-related intermediary services. Services were taxable even before amendment as they involved arranging/facilitating services in India. Extended limitation period upheld due to appellant's non-disclosure of relevant information. Appeal dismissed, confirming service tax liability and extended recovery period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
