Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT examined unverifiable purchases from 22 parties where assessee failed to provide conclusive proof. While books of accounts were accepted by AO and historical gross profit rates averaged 1.55% with current year at 1.6%, the Tribunal determined these transactions likely occurred in grey market warranting higher margins. Despite prior assessments under s.143(3) raising no concerns, ITAT estimated a 2.5% profit margin on disputed purchase value as reasonable given the informal nature of transactions. This modified profit estimation approach balanced the established business pattern with appropriate adjustments for unverified grey market dealings. Appeal partially allowed with revised profit computation.
ITAT examined unverifiable purchases from 22 parties where assessee failed to provide conclusive proof. While books of accounts were accepted by AO and historical gross profit rates averaged 1.55% with current year at 1.6%, the Tribunal determined these transactions likely occurred in grey market warranting higher margins. Despite prior assessments under s.143(3) raising no concerns, ITAT estimated a 2.5% profit margin on disputed purchase value as reasonable given the informal nature of transactions. This modified profit estimation approach balanced the established business pattern with appropriate adjustments for unverified grey market dealings. Appeal partially allowed with revised profit computation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.