Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT ruled against AO's addition under s.56(2)(vii)(b) of Rs. 50,65,900/- in a limited scrutiny case, finding the AO lacked jurisdiction to examine property valuation issues beyond the specific CASS-selected parameters without converting to complete scrutiny per CBDT Instruction No.20/2015. On s.54B deduction claim, ITAT partially allowed relief for two agricultural land parcels (1.424 hectares and 1.781 hectares) after confirming their agricultural usage in two years preceding transfer. The tribunal directed AO to verify other statutory conditions and allow appropriate deduction. The assessment order under s.143(3) was modified accordingly, with jurisdictional grounds quashed and agricultural land deduction claims partially sustained.
ITAT ruled against AO's addition under s.56(2)(vii)(b) of Rs. 50,65,900/- in a limited scrutiny case, finding the AO lacked jurisdiction to examine property valuation issues beyond the specific CASS-selected parameters without converting to complete scrutiny per CBDT Instruction No.20/2015. On s.54B deduction claim, ITAT partially allowed relief for two agricultural land parcels (1.424 hectares and 1.781 hectares) after confirming their agricultural usage in two years preceding transfer. The tribunal directed AO to verify other statutory conditions and allow appropriate deduction. The assessment order under s.143(3) was modified accordingly, with jurisdictional grounds quashed and agricultural land deduction claims partially sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.