Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT ruled against AO's addition under s.56(2)(vii)(b) of Rs. 50,65,900/- in a limited scrutiny case, finding the AO lacked jurisdiction to examine property valuation issues beyond the specific CASS-selected parameters without converting to complete scrutiny per CBDT Instruction No.20/2015. On s.54B deduction claim, ITAT partially allowed relief for two agricultural land parcels (1.424 hectares and 1.781 hectares) after confirming their agricultural usage in two years preceding transfer. The tribunal directed AO to verify other statutory conditions and allow appropriate deduction. The assessment order under s.143(3) was modified accordingly, with jurisdictional grounds quashed and agricultural land deduction claims partially sustained.
ITAT ruled against AO's addition under s.56(2)(vii)(b) of Rs. 50,65,900/- in a limited scrutiny case, finding the AO lacked jurisdiction to examine property valuation issues beyond the specific CASS-selected parameters without converting to complete scrutiny per CBDT Instruction No.20/2015. On s.54B deduction claim, ITAT partially allowed relief for two agricultural land parcels (1.424 hectares and 1.781 hectares) after confirming their agricultural usage in two years preceding transfer. The tribunal directed AO to verify other statutory conditions and allow appropriate deduction. The assessment order under s.143(3) was modified accordingly, with jurisdictional grounds quashed and agricultural land deduction claims partially sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.