Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT partially allowed the appeal concerning transfer pricing matters. The Tribunal remanded the aggregation approach issue back to TPO for verification of inter-linked transactions with documentary evidence, rejecting automatic reliance on previous years' decisions due to substantial changes in service nature. On Masala Bonds, ITAT accepted assessee's position allowing interest rate of 8.70% p.a. instead of TPO's 7.53% benchmark. The Tribunal directed refund of excess DDT payment subject to verification. Regarding tax credits, AO was instructed to allow appropriate MAT and TCS credits after record verification. TNMM application was scrutinized against TPO's preference for CUP and OM methods, emphasizing the need for transaction-specific analysis rather than blanket application of previous years' approaches.
ITAT partially allowed the appeal concerning transfer pricing matters. The Tribunal remanded the aggregation approach issue back to TPO for verification of inter-linked transactions with documentary evidence, rejecting automatic reliance on previous years' decisions due to substantial changes in service nature. On Masala Bonds, ITAT accepted assessee's position allowing interest rate of 8.70% p.a. instead of TPO's 7.53% benchmark. The Tribunal directed refund of excess DDT payment subject to verification. Regarding tax credits, AO was instructed to allow appropriate MAT and TCS credits after record verification. TNMM application was scrutinized against TPO's preference for CUP and OM methods, emphasizing the need for transaction-specific analysis rather than blanket application of previous years' approaches.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.