Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging NCLT Delhi's jurisdiction to entertain Section 95 applications against personal guarantors under IBC. The Tribunal held that NCLT is the appropriate adjudicating authority for personal guarantor insolvency proceedings per Section 60(1), regardless of whether proceedings against the corporate debtor are pending. The expression "without prejudice" in Section 60(2) does not limit NCLT's jurisdiction only to cases where CIRP/liquidation of corporate debtor is ongoing. Following Supreme Court's interpretation in Lalit Kumar Jain case, personal guarantors constitute a distinct category of individuals, and their insolvency resolution falls within NCLT's jurisdiction. The appeal lacked merit as NCLT Delhi had rightful jurisdiction to entertain the Section 95 application filed by the financial creditor.
NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging NCLT Delhi's jurisdiction to entertain Section 95 applications against personal guarantors under IBC. The Tribunal held that NCLT is the appropriate adjudicating authority for personal guarantor insolvency proceedings per Section 60(1), regardless of whether proceedings against the corporate debtor are pending. The expression "without prejudice" in Section 60(2) does not limit NCLT's jurisdiction only to cases where CIRP/liquidation of corporate debtor is ongoing. Following Supreme Court's interpretation in Lalit Kumar Jain case, personal guarantors constitute a distinct category of individuals, and their insolvency resolution falls within NCLT's jurisdiction. The appeal lacked merit as NCLT Delhi had rightful jurisdiction to entertain the Section 95 application filed by the financial creditor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
