Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC ruled in favor of petitioner's right to file under Section 84 of TNVAT Act, 2006 regarding input tax credit denial. Court determined that the Section 84 application was timely, and previous dismissals of writ petitions due to latches did not bar this remedy. Despite unavailability of appellate remedy under Section 51, Section 84 remedy remains valid, especially given settled law favoring assessees. Court quashed order dated 11.05.2022 and remanded case back to respondent for fresh merit-based determination. Significant precedent established regarding availability of Section 84 remedy independent of other procedural limitations.
HC ruled in favor of petitioner's right to file under Section 84 of TNVAT Act, 2006 regarding input tax credit denial. Court determined that the Section 84 application was timely, and previous dismissals of writ petitions due to latches did not bar this remedy. Despite unavailability of appellate remedy under Section 51, Section 84 remedy remains valid, especially given settled law favoring assessees. Court quashed order dated 11.05.2022 and remanded case back to respondent for fresh merit-based determination. Significant precedent established regarding availability of Section 84 remedy independent of other procedural limitations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.