Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC ruled in favor of petitioner's right to file under Section 84 of TNVAT Act, 2006 regarding input tax credit denial. Court determined that the Section 84 application was timely, and previous dismissals of writ petitions due to latches did not bar this remedy. Despite unavailability of appellate remedy under Section 51, Section 84 remedy remains valid, especially given settled law favoring assessees. Court quashed order dated 11.05.2022 and remanded case back to respondent for fresh merit-based determination. Significant precedent established regarding availability of Section 84 remedy independent of other procedural limitations.
HC ruled in favor of petitioner's right to file under Section 84 of TNVAT Act, 2006 regarding input tax credit denial. Court determined that the Section 84 application was timely, and previous dismissals of writ petitions due to latches did not bar this remedy. Despite unavailability of appellate remedy under Section 51, Section 84 remedy remains valid, especially given settled law favoring assessees. Court quashed order dated 11.05.2022 and remanded case back to respondent for fresh merit-based determination. Significant precedent established regarding availability of Section 84 remedy independent of other procedural limitations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.