Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC ruled in favor of petitioner's right to file under Section 84 of TNVAT Act, 2006 regarding input tax credit denial. Court determined that the Section 84 application was timely, and previous dismissals of writ petitions due to latches did not bar this remedy. Despite unavailability of appellate remedy under Section 51, Section 84 remedy remains valid, especially given settled law favoring assessees. Court quashed order dated 11.05.2022 and remanded case back to respondent for fresh merit-based determination. Significant precedent established regarding availability of Section 84 remedy independent of other procedural limitations.
HC ruled in favor of petitioner's right to file under Section 84 of TNVAT Act, 2006 regarding input tax credit denial. Court determined that the Section 84 application was timely, and previous dismissals of writ petitions due to latches did not bar this remedy. Despite unavailability of appellate remedy under Section 51, Section 84 remedy remains valid, especially given settled law favoring assessees. Court quashed order dated 11.05.2022 and remanded case back to respondent for fresh merit-based determination. Significant precedent established regarding availability of Section 84 remedy independent of other procedural limitations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.