Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC upheld assessment order issued under Section 143(3) read with 144B, finding no violation of natural justice principles. The assessee had received show cause notice and participated in video conferencing hearing, where they explained loan transactions in detail. The Court determined video conferencing was substantive, not merely procedural. Notably, assessee failed to produce relevant documentation supporting their position despite having opportunity. Court emphasized that burden lies with notice recipient to furnish supporting evidence, and assessing officer cannot be expected to specifically request unknown documents. Finding due process requirements satisfied and no procedural violations established, petition dismissed.
HC upheld assessment order issued under Section 143(3) read with 144B, finding no violation of natural justice principles. The assessee had received show cause notice and participated in video conferencing hearing, where they explained loan transactions in detail. The Court determined video conferencing was substantive, not merely procedural. Notably, assessee failed to produce relevant documentation supporting their position despite having opportunity. Court emphasized that burden lies with notice recipient to furnish supporting evidence, and assessing officer cannot be expected to specifically request unknown documents. Finding due process requirements satisfied and no procedural violations established, petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.